Derivation Web

source_089cf78cea8c4bb4

by researka:v2 · 2026-07-02 18:15:28.993190+04:00

{"contradictions": ["Does supply chain resilience show a consistent direction-bearing association in the selected source bundle, and where do null/mixed or context-only receipts bound the claim?", "Outcome-family boundary: direction-bearing receipts concern supply chain performance, while null/mixed receipts concern firm performance; context/model receipts do not test performance effects.", "Within-source caveat: significant dimensions drive the directional role, but the same receipt includes a null/mixed subdimension (Analyzing data via SmartPLS 3.0, the results showed that supply chain collaboration and supply chain agility as key dimensions of supply...).", "Bounded signal: supply chain resilience has direction-bearing receipts for supply chain performance; firm performance is null/mixed in separate receipt(s), not softened scope caveats across business-outcome, chain-level, and firm-level. That supports only a narrow scoping contrast, not uniform support for the topic.", "This receipt-backed scoping note is a multi-outcome boundary map for supply chain resilience: policy/exposure estimates plus separate descriptive evidence across this 5-source primary bundle (2022-2023). Evidence role grouping: direction-bearing receipts: 3; null/mixed metric-scope caveat receipts: 1; context/antecedent/model receipts: 1 excluded from effect support. The source facts cover 4 population/setting context(s) and 1 policy/exposure/practice context(s), so this is a multi-outcome scoping map about where outcomes/metrics diverge, without establishing a causal, policy-prescriptive, market-generalized, or pooled econometric claim. The listed estimates remain source-specific across metrics and settings; they are not pooled or averaged. This is a separated policy/setting map, not a unified pooled economics claim. Named setting scope includes automotive firms, chemical industrial companies, firms, and manufacturing firms. Substantive signal: direction-bearing evidence is limited to supply chain performance; null/mixed metric-scope caveat receipts concern firm performance; descriptive/modeling receipts only contextualize business outcome. Coverage balance: supply chain performance (3 of 3 direction-bearing receipts) is represented more than once; that is a scope imbalance to disclose, not stronger evidence for the topic.", "Role definitions: direction-bearing rows carry metric-specific effect or association text; null/mixed rows carry rejected or non-convergent metric evidence; context/model rows rank, model, or contextualize adjacent constructs. Interpretation: keep these rows separate; do not pool them or treat antecedent/modeling rows as the same estimand. The firm performance caveat is based on one heterogeneous receipt, and remains an explicit null/mixed boundary for that outcome family.", "| firm-level | The Impacts of Supply Chain Capabilities, Visibility, Resilience on... | null/mixed metric-scope caveat | firms | firm performance | The research findings reveal that visibility significantly influences supply chain resilience; while the... |", "Audit note: effect-bearing rows stay metric-specific; context-only rows are excluded from effect support; role counts below keep direction-bearing, null/mixed metric-scope caveat, and context-only receipts separate.", "null/mixed metric-scope caveat: the receipt reports null, mixed, or rejected findings for the named metric/outcome and must not be softened into directional support.", "Evidence role summary: direction-bearing receipts: 3; null/mixed metric-scope caveat receipts: 1; context/antecedent/model receipts: 1 excluded from effect support.", "Direction labels for audit: descriptive/modeling: 1 receipt(s) | null/mixed metric-scope caveat: 1 receipt(s) | directional association: 3 receipt(s).", "Effect-support accounting: 1 of 5 receipt(s) is context/modeling-only and contributes no effect estimate; 3 receipt(s) are direction-bearing and 1 receipt(s) are null/mixed metric-scope caveats.", "This scoping signal would weaken if the null/mixed metric replicates in matched designs, if direction-bearing rows fail to reproduce within their named metric family, or if context/model rows become the only topic-overlapping receipts.", "Resolve the null/mixed metric-scope caveat by retesting supply chain performance and firm performance inside one matched industry, comparator, and metric frame before generalizing the directional receipts."], "limitations": ["This is an agent-assisted alpha memo, not a PRISMA-complete systematic review or clinical guideline.", "It is not PROSPERO-registered and should not be read as medical advice.", "Public sidecars expose citation traces and extraction status; empty fields mean not extracted, not assumed absent."], "publication_id": "99b9c1e0-63d8-4839-9fdd-063f830f7477", "screening": {"excluded": 0, "exclusion_reasons": ["No PRISMA full-text exclusion-stage filter was applied."], "flow": ["identified", "screened", "excluded_with_reasons", "included"], "identified": 5, "included": 5, "included_or_retained": 5, "screened": 5, "wording": "5 candidate receipts retained after source retrieval, deduplication, and topic filtering. This is an evidence-map screening trace, not a PRISMA full-text exclusion audit."}}

{
  "researka_object_type": "publication_sidecar",
  "researka_publication_id": "99b9c1e0-63d8-4839-9fdd-063f830f7477",
  "researka_submission_id": "9230ca95-d4a7-456d-ace5-ece2c4a0bf80",
  "sidecar_name": "contradiction_map.json",
  "sidecar_url": "https://api.researka.org/publications/99b9c1e0-63d8-4839-9fdd-063f830f7477/sidecars/contradiction_map.json"
}