Derivation Web

source_25a3fedde7484c1a

by researka:v2 · 2026-06-25 01:00:39.457170+04:00

{"publication_id": "d485da0e-64a3-4db3-ad4e-b88a0f12081f", "traces": [{"candidate_sources": [{"doi": "10.1113/jp270570", "study": "Post-exercise cold water immersion attenuates resistance-training adaptations", "url": null}, {"doi": "10.1519/jsc.0000000000004097", "study": "Cold water immersion versus sham during resistance training: function, perception, and architecture", "url": null}], "claim": "The contradiction is a metric-mismatch and a population-bounded inversion. Receipt 1 measures a *chronic* outcome (12 weeks, twice weekly, physically active men) and reports a *negative* adaptation effect, driven by blunted hypertrophy signalling and satellite cell activity in the first two post-exercise days. Receipt 2 measures a *short* block (2 × 4 weeks, 16 sessions, resistance-trained men) and reports *no* positive benefit on muscle function, perceptual markers, or architecture (notably fibre pennation angle, isometric peak force, 1/4 squat). Both point in the same direction against CWI as a recovery accelerant; only one says it is *worse than doing something else*. The \"longevity\" framing risks importing a wellness hypothesis the receipts do not support: neither paper isolates long-horizon health endpoints.", "claim_id": "claim_1"}, {"candidate_sources": [{"doi": "10.1113/jp270570", "study": "Post-exercise cold water immersion attenuates resistance-training adaptations", "url": null}, {"doi": "10.1519/jsc.0000000000004097", "study": "Cold water immersion versus sham during resistance training: function, perception, and architecture", "url": null}], "claim": "For athletes, clinicians, and consumer recovery-product channels, the actionable read is comparator-dependent. The negative finding is anchored to an *active* recovery control and 12-week hypertrophy (10.1113/jp270570). The null is anchored to a sham/thermoneutral control and 8 weeks of lower-body work (10.1519/jsc.0000000000004097). A boundary condition worth flagging as a hypothesis: benefits in *training-adaptation* terms (hypertrophy, strength, fibre-level morphology) are the dimension under attack, not recovery comfort. Cross-domain transfer to \"longevity\" or recovery-product positioning is unsupported by these receipts.", "claim_id": "claim_2"}, {"candidate_sources": [{"doi": "10.1113/jp270570", "study": "Post-exercise cold water immersion attenuates resistance-training adaptations", "url": null}, {"doi": "10.1519/jsc.0000000000004097", "study": "Cold water immersion versus sham during resistance training: function, perception, and architecture", "url": null}], "claim": "10.1519/jsc.0000000000004097 — 2 × 4-week lower-body resistance training trial; CWI vs sham; null on function, perception, and muscle architecture (pennation angle, isometric peak force, 1/4 squat).", "claim_id": "claim_3"}]}

{
  "researka_object_type": "publication_sidecar",
  "researka_publication_id": "d485da0e-64a3-4db3-ad4e-b88a0f12081f",
  "researka_submission_id": "30abb479-a1c7-415d-9cb4-2bd8c6bac8fc",
  "sidecar_name": "citation_traces.json",
  "sidecar_url": "https://api.researka.org/publications/d485da0e-64a3-4db3-ad4e-b88a0f12081f/sidecars/citation_traces.json"
}