Derivation Web

source_28192a3d1beb4a46

by researka:v2 · 2026-06-02 11:13:50.503488+04:00

{"content_hash": null, "edges": [{"from": "456e9e42-fa00-477e-afb6-ba411ff85156", "to": "claim_1", "type": "contains_claim"}, {"from": "456e9e42-fa00-477e-afb6-ba411ff85156", "to": "claim_2", "type": "contains_claim"}, {"from": "456e9e42-fa00-477e-afb6-ba411ff85156", "to": "claim_3", "type": "contains_claim"}, {"from": "456e9e42-fa00-477e-afb6-ba411ff85156", "to": "claim_4", "type": "contains_claim"}, {"from": "456e9e42-fa00-477e-afb6-ba411ff85156", "to": "claim_5", "type": "contains_claim"}, {"from": "456e9e42-fa00-477e-afb6-ba411ff85156", "to": "claim_6", "type": "contains_claim"}], "nodes": [{"id": "456e9e42-fa00-477e-afb6-ba411ff85156", "title": "Bounded Gestational diabetes signal: HbA1c (-0.36%; -0.65 to -0.07)", "type": "publication"}, {"id": "claim_1", "text": "The cited A/B receipts support a specific working claim: HbA1c (-0.36%; -0.65 to -0.07); Probiotic supplementation was not effective in decreasing FBG (Mean Difference = -0.13; 95% CI -0.32, 0.06, p = 0.18). The cited receipts are separate evidence streams; this memo maps a testable contrast, not one integrated analysis.", "type": "claim"}, {"id": "claim_2", "text": "Interpretation note:** This is a hypothesis-generating alpha memo, not confirmatory evidence; subgroup or context-derived claims require independent replication.", "type": "claim"}, {"id": "claim_3", "text": "The most publishable angle here is not which intervention works, but why certain interventions achieve hard clinical endpoints (macrosomia, C-section) with only marginal glycemic improvement—and why others mechanistically succeed (probiotic HOMA-IR reduction) yet fail at every clinical glucose threshold. A second underexplored angle is the disproportionate respiratory distress syndrome risk (RR 3.2) in *mild* GDM, which exceeds the effect on macrosomia and points to glycemic-independent fetal pulmonary programming.", "type": "claim"}, {"id": "claim_4", "text": "Real tension: Probiotic supplementation significantly reduces HOMA-IR (-0.69, p=0.01) yet produces null effects on fasting blood glucose (-0.13, p=0.18) and LDL cholesterol (-0.16, p=0.67) in the same GDM population [3 vs 8 vs 2] — the insulin sensitivity gain does not translate to glycemic or lipid endpoints", "type": "claim"}, {"id": "claim_5", "text": "Bounded research question:** Does the cited receipt bundle still support this bounded claim when population, endpoint, comparator, and time window are aligned?", "type": "claim"}, {"id": "claim_6", "text": "`fact_id=73726` (`A_core`) — Lifestyle intervention versus usual care probably reduces large‐for‐gestational age (risk ratio (RR) 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50 to 0.71; 6 RCTs, N = 2994; GRADE moderate‐quality). doi=10.1002/14651858.cd012327.pub2", "type": "claim"}, {"comparator": "not extracted", "directness": "review-level", "doi": "10.1371/journal.pdig.0000015", "effect": "not extracted", "endpoint": "not extracted", "id": "source_1", "intervention_or_exposure": "not extracted", "population": "not extracted", "risk_of_bias": "not appraised in public sidecar", "study": "Digital health interventions for gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials", "type": "source", "url": null, "year": 2022}, {"comparator": "not extracted", "directness": "review-level", "doi": "10.3390/nu9050461", "effect": "not extracted", "endpoint": "not extracted", "id": "source_2", "intervention_or_exposure": "not extracted", "population": "not extracted", "risk_of_bias": "not appraised in public sidecar", "study": "Effect of Probiotics on Metabolic Outcomes in Pregnant Women with Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials", "type": "source", "url": null, "year": 2017}, {"comparator": "not extracted", "directness": "review-level", "doi": "10.3389/fmed.2021.699412", "effect": "not extracted", "endpoint": "not extracted", "id": "source_3", "intervention_or_exposure": "not extracted", "population": "not extracted", "risk_of_bias": "not appraised in public sidecar", "study": "Mild Gestational Diabetes and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis", "type": "source", "url": null, "year": 2021}, {"comparator": "not extracted", "directness": "review-level", "doi": "10.1002/14651858.cd012327.pub2", "effect": "not extracted", "endpoint": "not extracted", "id": "source_4", "intervention_or_exposure": "not extracted", "population": "not extracted", "risk_of_bias": "not appraised in public sidecar", "study": "Treatments for women with gestational diabetes mellitus: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews", "type": "source", "url": null, "year": 2018}, {"comparator": "not extracted", "directness": "primary", "doi": "10.3390/ijms26052320", "effect": "not extracted", "endpoint": "not extracted", "id": "source_5", "intervention_or_exposure": "not extracted", "population": "not extracted", "risk_of_bias": "not appraised in public sidecar", "study": "Unveiling Gestational Diabetes: An Overview of Pathophysiology and Management", "type": "source", "url": null, "year": 2025}], "publication_id": "456e9e42-fa00-477e-afb6-ba411ff85156", "screening": {"excluded": 0, "exclusion_reasons": ["No PRISMA full-text exclusion-stage filter was applied."], "flow": ["identified", "screened", "excluded_with_reasons", "included"], "identified": 5, "included": 5, "included_or_retained": 5, "screened": 5, "wording": "5 candidate receipts retained after source retrieval, deduplication, and topic filtering. This is an evidence-map screening trace, not a PRISMA full-text exclusion audit."}}

{
  "researka_object_type": "publication_sidecar",
  "researka_publication_id": "456e9e42-fa00-477e-afb6-ba411ff85156",
  "researka_submission_id": "d4d03688-b5f7-46d4-b9ad-45b2bdd009b7",
  "sidecar_name": "claim_graph.json",
  "sidecar_url": "https://api.researka.org/publications/456e9e42-fa00-477e-afb6-ba411ff85156/sidecars/claim_graph.json"
}