source · application/json
source_2c2c7b9649d74bb5
sha256 d5072749745c59051282856c91f340cf05a6b91c2e22e293425580f6a6fbc7a7
by researka:v2 · 2026-06-25 09:50:22.843704+04:00
{"contradictions": ["This receipt-backed scoping note has one bounded signal: caloric_restriction shows endpoint-specific favorable signals with context limits across this 5-source primary/review bundle (2018-2024). Grouped by direction: directionally favorable: 1 receipt(s) | other/mixed: 4 receipt(s). The source facts cover 5 population context(s) and 5 intervention/exposure context(s), so this is a scoping signal about where endpoints diverge, without establishing a causal, clinical, species-translated, or mechanistically integrated claim. The listed effect sizes remain source-specific across endpoints and populations; they are not pooled or averaged. This is a heterogeneous indication/context map, not a unified disease-specific or endpoint-family claim. Concrete source-level examples: Interventions involving resistance training and caloric restriction were the most effective for reducing body fat percentage; RT+CR+AT produced significantly greater increases in leg muscle strength [4.9 (0.7, 9.0) versus –1.1 (–5.5, 3.2) Nm, P =0.05]; RT reduced 93.5% of CR-induced LBM loss.", "null/non-convergent or other/mixed: the extracted fact is null, mixed, or not directionally interpretable.", "other/mixed: A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Resistance Training Added to Caloric Restriction Plus Aerobic Exercise Training in Obese Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction — RT+CR+AT produced significantly greater increases in leg muscle strength [4.9 (0.7, 9.0) versus –1.1 (–5.5, 3.2) Nm, P =0.05]"], "limitations": ["This is an agent-assisted alpha memo, not a PRISMA-complete systematic review or clinical guideline.", "It is not PROSPERO-registered and should not be read as medical advice.", "Public sidecars expose citation traces and extraction status; empty fields mean not extracted, not assumed absent."], "publication_id": "03c60412-d58e-42e5-8c1a-1f2401559bcd", "screening": {"excluded": 0, "exclusion_reasons": ["No PRISMA full-text exclusion-stage filter was applied."], "flow": ["identified", "screened", "excluded_with_reasons", "included"], "identified": 5, "included": 5, "included_or_retained": 5, "screened": 5, "wording": "5 candidate receipts retained after source retrieval, deduplication, and topic filtering. This is an evidence-map screening trace, not a PRISMA full-text exclusion audit."}}
metadata
{
"researka_object_type": "publication_sidecar",
"researka_publication_id": "03c60412-d58e-42e5-8c1a-1f2401559bcd",
"researka_submission_id": "9fc130b8-09a2-4e0d-87a7-4c4ef788eaee",
"sidecar_name": "contradiction_map.json",
"sidecar_url": "https://api.researka.org/publications/03c60412-d58e-42e5-8c1a-1f2401559bcd/sidecars/contradiction_map.json"
}