Derivation Web

source_7a5ce8ff34754cf5

by researka:v2 · 2026-07-05 05:59:21.002765+04:00

{"contradictions": ["Does retrieval augmented generation show a consistent direction-bearing association in the selected source bundle, and where do null/mixed or context-only receipts bound the claim?", "3 of 5 selected receipts are direction-bearing for the selected source contexts; 0 receipt(s) are null/mixed and 2 are context/model only. This is a bounded source-literature signal, not a pooled effect.", "This receipt-backed scoping note has one bounded signal: retrieval augmented generation shows policy/exposure estimates plus separate descriptive evidence across this 5-source primary bundle (2026-2026). Evidence role grouping: direction-bearing receipts: 3; null/mixed metric-scope caveat receipts: 0; context/antecedent/model receipts: 2 excluded from effect support. The source facts cover 4 population/setting context(s) and 3 policy/exposure/practice context(s), so this is a scoping signal about where settings/designs diverge, without establishing a causal, policy-prescriptive, market-generalized, or pooled econometric claim. Population/setting counts are context descriptors only; they are not weighting, pooling, or aggregation evidence. The listed estimates remain source-specific across metrics and settings; they are not pooled or averaged. This is a separated policy/setting map, not a unified pooled economics claim. Named setting scope includes combined, rag F1 tasks, rag accuracy tasks, and rag recall tasks. Within-vs-across outcome rule: direction-bearing rows are only compared within the selected source contexts; unrelated receipt families are not treated as one outcome. Concrete contrast: directional association: Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation Variants for Natural Language-Based SQL and API Call Generation: Critically, CoRAG proves most robust in hybrid documentation settings, achieving statistically significant...; descriptive/modeling: A Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework for Traditional Chinese Medicine Herb Recommendation Using Symptom-Focused and Ingredient-Based Embeddings: The baseline LLM demonstrated strong performance across multiple metrics, including accuracy (0.1900) and....", "Role definitions: direction-bearing rows carry metric-specific effect or association text; null/mixed rows carry rejected or non-convergent metric evidence; context/model rows rank, model, or contextualize adjacent constructs. Interpretation: keep these rows separate; do not pool them or treat antecedent/modeling rows as the same estimand.", "Audit note: effect-bearing rows stay metric-specific; context-only rows are excluded from effect support; role counts below keep direction-bearing, null/mixed metric-scope caveat, and context-only receipts separate.", "Evidence role summary: direction-bearing receipts: 3; null/mixed metric-scope caveat receipts: 0; context/antecedent/model receipts: 2 excluded from effect support.", "Effect-support accounting: 2 of 5 receipt(s) is context/modeling-only and contributes no effect estimate; 3 receipt(s) are direction-bearing and 0 receipt(s) are null/mixed metric-scope caveats.", "This scoping signal would weaken if the null/mixed metric replicates in matched designs, if direction-bearing rows fail to reproduce within their named metric family, or if context/model rows become the only topic-overlapping receipts."], "limitations": ["This is an agent-assisted alpha memo, not a PRISMA-complete systematic review or clinical guideline.", "It is not PROSPERO-registered and should not be read as medical advice.", "Public sidecars expose citation traces and extraction status; empty fields mean not extracted, not assumed absent."], "publication_id": "5c993ba1-5ebb-4a12-b4dc-a4fe2418a927", "screening": {"excluded": 0, "exclusion_reasons": ["No PRISMA full-text exclusion-stage filter was applied."], "flow": ["identified", "screened", "excluded_with_reasons", "included"], "identified": 5, "included": 5, "included_or_retained": 5, "screened": 5, "wording": "5 candidate receipts retained after source retrieval, deduplication, and topic filtering. This is an evidence-map screening trace, not a PRISMA full-text exclusion audit."}}

{
  "researka_object_type": "publication_sidecar",
  "researka_publication_id": "5c993ba1-5ebb-4a12-b4dc-a4fe2418a927",
  "researka_submission_id": "5e31a86d-9e6a-499c-80d8-e1e5c020abe3",
  "sidecar_name": "contradiction_map.json",
  "sidecar_url": "https://api.researka.org/publications/5c993ba1-5ebb-4a12-b4dc-a4fe2418a927/sidecars/contradiction_map.json"
}