Derivation Web

source_83d8208e968f45b2

by researka:v2 · 2026-05-28 13:36:34.435634+04:00

{"contradictions": ["What does the current evidence establish about Akkermansia Muciniphila and human geroscience? This synthesis tests the thesis that evidence for Akkermansia muciniphila is context-dependent, separating outcome-specific signals from broader claims and identifying the evidence gaps that should bound interpretation. This paper synthesizes akkermansia muciniphila as an aging-related intervention across 78 included source papers and 2155 high-confidence extracted claims. The evidence profile contains 1 direct clinical source, 47 adjacent clinical sources, and 19 mechanistic or model-system sources, with 1184 cross-study disagreements across the evidence base. Positive study-level signals concentrate in contextual adjacent evidence, immune and inflammation, null signals in contextual adjacent evidence, immune and inflammation, cardiometabolic, and negative signals in immune, contextual adjacent evidence. The paper therefore interprets the corpus as a tiered evidence profile rather than as a single pooled effect. The conclusion is that akkermansia muciniphila remains a bounded geroscience case: mechanistic plausibility and selected clinical signals justify further targeted testing, while mixed and null findings limit any unqualified anti-aging claim.", "4 included sources were assigned to this outcome class. Directional coding: mixed=1, negative=1, null=2. Directness coding: indirect=3, mechanistic=1."], "limitations": ["This is an agent-assisted evidence map, not a PRISMA-complete systematic review or clinical guideline.", "It is not PROSPERO-registered and should not be read as medical advice.", "Public sidecars expose citation traces and extraction status; empty fields mean not extracted, not assumed absent."], "publication_id": "019d3db7-0843-4319-bdec-c34cd9eea4ce", "screening": {"excluded": 0, "exclusion_reasons": ["No PRISMA full-text exclusion-stage filter was applied."], "flow": ["identified", "screened", "excluded_with_reasons", "included"], "identified": 78, "included": 78, "included_or_retained": 78, "screened": 78, "wording": "78 candidate receipts retained after source retrieval, deduplication, and topic filtering. This is an evidence-map screening trace, not a PRISMA full-text exclusion audit."}}

{
  "researka_object_type": "publication_sidecar",
  "researka_publication_id": "019d3db7-0843-4319-bdec-c34cd9eea4ce",
  "researka_submission_id": "fa2cfa75-9504-4739-b4a7-5d475106e44b",
  "sidecar_name": "contradiction_map.json",
  "sidecar_url": "https://api.researka.org/publications/019d3db7-0843-4319-bdec-c34cd9eea4ce/sidecars/contradiction_map.json"
}