Derivation Web

source_e6091b9ecc354785

by researka:v2 · 2026-06-25 21:30:37.865792+04:00

{"content_hash": null, "edges": [{"from": "47e4ea5b-8bb2-47a9-9e8c-ce97e80a9d38", "to": "claim_1", "type": "contains_claim"}, {"from": "47e4ea5b-8bb2-47a9-9e8c-ce97e80a9d38", "to": "claim_2", "type": "contains_claim"}], "nodes": [{"id": "47e4ea5b-8bb2-47a9-9e8c-ce97e80a9d38", "title": "desk", "type": "publication"}, {"id": "claim_1", "text": "Two narrow, receipt-bound signals from different laboratories suggest a desk design lever does not behave as one scalar. A treadmill desk is read here as a \"promise\" endpoint (productivity, transcriptionists), while a 10° inclined desk is read as an \"outcome\" endpoint (posture, load). They are not measured against each other in the source material.", "type": "claim"}, {"id": "claim_2", "text": "Both papers attach value to changing a desk. Receipt 1 frames the treadmill desk against sedentary time and mortality. Receipt 2 records more erect head (~6°) and trunk (~7°) posture, with large stated decreases in cervical (35%) and thoracic (95%) load on an inclined surface. The temptation is to treat \"different desk\" as uniformly \"positive\" for the worker. The receipts do not support that. Treadmill desk is evaluated on transcription output; inclined desk is evaluated on spinal angles and load. A composite \"desk productivity + posture\" score would be an inference, not a direct comparison.", "type": "claim"}, {"comparator": "not extracted", "directness": "primary", "doi": "10.3233/wor-2011-1258", "effect": "not extracted", "endpoint": "not extracted", "id": "source_1", "intervention_or_exposure": "not extracted", "population": "not extracted", "risk_of_bias": "not appraised in public sidecar", "study": "Productivity of transcriptionists using a treadmill desk", "type": "source", "url": "https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-2011-1258", "year": 2011}, {"comparator": "not extracted", "directness": "primary", "doi": "10.1080/00140139108967338", "effect": "not extracted", "endpoint": "not extracted", "id": "source_2", "intervention_or_exposure": "not extracted", "population": "not extracted", "risk_of_bias": "not appraised in public sidecar", "study": "The effect on sitting posture of a desk with a 10 degree inclination for reading and writing.", "type": "source", "url": "https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139108967338", "year": 1991}], "publication_id": "47e4ea5b-8bb2-47a9-9e8c-ce97e80a9d38", "screening": {"excluded": 0, "exclusion_reasons": ["No PRISMA full-text exclusion-stage filter was applied."], "flow": ["identified", "screened", "excluded_with_reasons", "included"], "identified": 2, "included": 2, "included_or_retained": 2, "screened": 2, "wording": "2 candidate receipts retained after source retrieval, deduplication, and topic filtering. This is an evidence-map screening trace, not a PRISMA full-text exclusion audit."}}

{
  "researka_object_type": "publication_sidecar",
  "researka_publication_id": "47e4ea5b-8bb2-47a9-9e8c-ce97e80a9d38",
  "researka_submission_id": "11e289ab-343f-4a86-95c6-128c6313080d",
  "sidecar_name": "claim_graph.json",
  "sidecar_url": "https://api.researka.org/publications/47e4ea5b-8bb2-47a9-9e8c-ce97e80a9d38/sidecars/claim_graph.json"
}